Skip to main content

Guardian Unlimited
Sign in | Register 
Go to:  
The ObserverFocus
Home UK news International Politics Business Comment Leaders Focus
Sport Review Magazine Screen Travel Cash Letters Food

Focus





  Tools
Text-only version
Send it to a friend
Save story

  The Observer  
Front page
Story index

 Recent articles
Focus: Why I wish I'd been a young mum

Focus: Britons between the sheets

Focus: Gangsters, blackmail and sleaze in the ugly game

Focus: US elections

Focus: US electionsc - the debates

Focus: US elections

Focus: Read your (ex) lover like a book

Focus: Ageing Britain

Amal Al-Muddaris: Everyday terror of my chaotic city, Baghdad

Alan Johnson: We will have to retire later

Focus: Why secret efforts to save Ken Bigley were doomed to failure

Charles Glass: America could have saved Ken Bigley

Focus: Facing defeat, Saddam clung to his fantasies

Focus: Bob Dylan in print

Focus: Middle class? Yes, but which type are you?

  The Guardian  
Front page
Story index




UP

Focus

Weapon that could transform the war

Forget the laser targeted JDAMs and Hellfires: the real transformation in the American military has come in a far more mundane area: transportation

Dan Plesch
Sunday March 9, 2003
The Observer


The US now has the ability to fly 70-ton battle tanks over huge distances. This means that America is less reliant on bases in the region to support an invasion of Iraq. It is a key transformation that is as much of a breakthrough today as the technique of dropping parachute troops far behind enemy lines was in the Second World War.

Then paratroopers had to wait for their tanks to catch up overland. Today's US Air Force can fly in the tanks too, radically changing the strategic realities of land and air war. The key piece of equipment is the Boeing C-17 Globemaster transport plane. First introduced in 1993, the C-17 can carry the 70-ton M1 Abrams main battle tank, smaller M2 Bradley tanks and even helicopters. Most importantly the C-17 can land on dirt airstrips and on short runways of 3,000 feet. Traditional transporters can do neither.

Put the C17's capabilities together and it means that the Pentagon can fly tanks into short dirt airstrips in the middle of nowhere. This means that airstrips in northern Iraq can be used, if time allows, to launch armoured attacks. The US Air Force has specialist Red Horse teams whose job is to clear and repair an airstrip rapidly, or when necessary make one from scratch. Helicopter-borne troops can seize an airfield and then, as they expand around the base, transport aircraft begin to arrive.

The C-17s can come in one after the other, like passenger planes dropping down to Heathrow. The armour they disgorge will give a hardened spine of reassurance to otherwise lightly armed parachute troops. But though transporting large numbers of tanks in this way would put too much strain even on US resources, the M1 Abrams is the undoubted king of the battlefield and only a few would give massive support to the rest of any invasion force. In 1991 the most dramatic US operation was a drive of 100 miles by Airborne forces north from Kuwait.

Advertiser links

Any Purpose Loans for UK Homeowners

Borrow £5,000 to £100,000 at rates from 6.9% Apr. Instant...

loansdirect.org.uk

Direct Line Low-Cost Car Loan - 6% APR

Typical APR 6.4% fixed. Borrow from £2,000 to £25,000. Six...

uk.directline.com

Car Loans at Netcars2000

Car loans - apply online for competitive rates and a fast...

netcars2000.com



Special reports
Iraq crisis: Observer special
Special report: Iraq
Special report: the anti-war movement
Observer Worldview

News
09.03.2003: Blair sets out final terms to avoid war
09.03.2003: GCHQ arrest over Observer spying report
09.03.2003: The UN vote explained

In Iraq
09.03.2003: Baghdad's elite keep up their social whirl
09.03.2003: Pillar of fire waits for US in Kirkuk
09.03.2003: Our lives as human shields

Military build-up
09.03.2003: Focus: The pros against the rag-tag conscripts
09.03.2003: Weapon that could transform the war

The dirty tricks memo
09.03.2003: UN launches inquiry into American spying
09.03.2003: The spies and the spinner
02.03.2003: Bugging plan: read the US memo
Talk: US dirty tricks
09.03.2003: Norman Solomon: US dodging the awkward truth
09.03.2003: Ian Davis: The long history of UN espionage
09.03.2003: Martin Bright: In praise of global dialogue

Terror threat
09.03.2003: Focus: The hunt for bin Laden
09.03.2003: Al-Qaeda's most wanted... dead and alive
Terrorism crisis: Observer special

What fuels fundamentalism?
09.03.2003: Inside the mind of a terrorist

Iraq crisis: Observer Comment
09.03.2003: Jason Burke: Why I believe this war is right
09.03.2003: Leader: Iraq has one last chance to disarm
09.03.2003: David Aaronovitch: Thank the Yank
09.03.2003: Andrew Rawnsley: Prime Minister, go to bed now
09.03.2003: David Beresford: A dove in hawk's feathers
09.03.2003: Terry Jones: Mr Bush goes for the kill
09.03.2003: Adam Roberts: The UN will survive this storm
09.03.2003: William Keegan: Brown prepares a blank war cheque
Email your views to debate@observer.co.uk

The Blix report
08.03.2003: 'We have faced relatively few difficulties'
08.03.2003: Blix pleads for time to finish the job
08.03.2003: Showdown as Britain sets March 17 deadline on Iraq
08.03.2003: Target nations harden opposition
08.03.2003: The UN: Right or wrong?
08.03.2003: Guardian leader: The disarming Mr Blix
07.03.2003: Blix and El-Baradei: Key points
07.03.2003: Blix wants months - and Straw offers 10 days

Iraq after Saddam
23.02.2003: Val Percival: Lessons from Kosovo
16.02.2003: Iraqi opposition slams plan for military governor
16.02.2003: Kanan Makiya: Our hopes betrayed
Talk: Iraq's democrats betrayed?
09.02.2003: Focus: The Iraq Bush will build
09.02.2003: Robert L Barry: The next Yugoslavia?

The UN divided
02.03.2003: Focus: America the arm-twister
23.02.2003: Focus: Twilight of a tyrant
16.02.2003: Focus: Worlds apart on war
02.03.2003: Nick Taylor: Guinea's moment of fame

Observer highlights: the broadest debate
02.03.2003: Andrew Rawnsley: Journey into the unknown
02.03.2003: Michael Portillo: Labour won't forgive
02.03.2003: Roy Hattersley: The days of obedience are over
02.03.2003: Mary Warnock: Any war demands morality
02.03.2003: Leader: Blair must win the argument
02.03.2003: Nick Cohen: The only way to peace
02.03.2003: Terry Jones: Tony Blair and the hawks
02.03.2003: Rosemary Hollis: A diplomatic solution?
02.03.2003: Peter Preston: Balance will be the first casualty
02.02.2003: Vincent Cable: The economic consequences of war
19.01.2003: Leader: Why force may be needed
Talk: Where do you stand on Iraq?
16.02.2003: Andrew Rawnsley: It's do or die, Prime Minister
16.02.2003: Tony Blair: The price of my conviction
09.02.2003: Mary Riddell: With Bible and bombs
16.02.2003: Nick Cohen: The Left isn't listening
23.02.2003: William Shawcross: Why Saddam will never disarm
16.02.2003: Dan Plesch: Disarm Saddam without war
16.02.2003: Henry Porter: One rule for Israel, another for Saddam
26.01.2003: Charles Kennedy: We're being bulldozed into war
16.02.2003: Leader: We must not rule out war
09.02.2003: Leader: The dossier that shamed Britain
26.01.2003: Letters: What you say about our stand on Iraq
16.02.2003: Mary Riddell: The great unheard finally speak out
09.02.2003: Jason Burke: Powell doesn't know who he is up against
02.02.2003: David Aaronovitch: Why the Left is wrong on Saddam
16.02.2003: Anthony Sampson: Why Britain's war?
09.02.2003: Jason Burke: The missing link?
19.01.2003: Debate: What prominent Britons think
02.02.2003: Gil Loescher: The refugee crisis
26.01.2003: Mary Riddell: Don't disdain the doves
26.01.2003: Terry Jones: My neighbour trouble
05.01.2003: Nick Cohen: Saddam won't run
14.07.2002: John Pilger: The great charade
29.12.2002: Ken Nichols: Back to Iraq as a human shield
15.09.2002: Jason Burke: Return to Kurdistan
01.09.2002: Dilip Hiro: US blind eye to poison gas
11.08.2002: Nick Cohen: Who will save Iraq?
04.08.2002: Richard Harries: Not a just war
25.08.2002: Christopher Hitchens: With friends like these
22.09.2002: Terry Jones: The audacious courage of Mr Blair
22.09.2002: Rosemary Hollis: Hawks won't stop with Baghdad
11.08.2002: Mark Leonard: Could the left back war?
17.03.2002: John Lloyd: Anti-Americanism betrays the left
17.02.2002: Terry Jones: George's friendly bombs
02.12.2001: David Rose: The doves are wrong - again

Special reports
Iraq: Observer special
Observer Worldview
Politics: Focus on Iraq
Afghanistan
Terrorism crisis
Islam and the West
Guardian Unlimited Politics

More global commentary
More from Peter Beaumont
More from Jason Burke
More from Ed Vulliamy
More from Mark Leonard
More from Dan Plesch
Worldview highlights: debating American power

Useful links
UNSCOM
UN resolutions on Iraq
British Foreign Office: Relations with Iraq
US State Department Iraq Update
Arab.net - Iraq resources
Campaign against Sanctions on Iraq
Centre for non-proliferation studies






UP

 
 
Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2004